Tag Archives: Church

For Ministers

Don’t Like Too Many Church Programs? Ten Reasons Not To

Over at The Gospel Coalition, Jared C. Wilson posted a blog article giving 10 reasons to underprogram your church. I thoroughly enjoyed the article. After reading Iain Murray’s biography of D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, I became more convinced than I previously was that a church can be spiritually vibrant without needing to be program-driven.

Here are Jared’s 10 reasons:

  1. You can do a lot of things in a mediocre (or poor) way, or you can do a few things extremely well.
  2. Over-programming creates an illusion of fruitfulness that may just be busy-ness.
  3. Over-programming is a detriment to single-mindedness in a community.
  4. Over-programming runs the risk of turning a church into a host of extracurricular activities, mirroring the “Type-A family” mode of suburban achievers.
  5. Over-programming dilutes actual ministry effectiveness.
  6. Over-programming leads to segmentation among ages, life stages, and affinities, which can create divisions in a church body.
  7. Over-programming creates satisfaction in an illusion of success; meanwhile mission suffers.
  8. Over-programming reduces margin in the lives of church members.
  9. Over-programming gets a church further away from the New Testament vision of the local church.
  10. Over-programming is usually the result of un-self-reflective reflex reactions to perceived needs and and an inability to kill sacred cows that are actually already dead.

I encourage you to read the posts to see his explanation of each point.

For Ministers

The Core Tasks of Christian Ministry

Eric Geiger (probably best known for co-authoring The Simple Church with Thom. S. Rainer) has a great post about the core of Christian ministry. He says:

For a church to be deficient in discipleship is to be deficient in the church’s fundamental reason for existence. If any organization is shoddy in its core reason for existence, it matters nothing if the organization excels at other things. If Apple is deficient in designing computers, it matters nothing if they excel in outfitting and decorating their stores. If Starbucks is deficient in coffee, mastering the art of creating loyal employees means nothing. To be deficient in your core reason for existence is always unacceptable.

We have learned to do many things as church leaders. We build buildings. We design programs. We challenge donors. We staff our churches. We put on events. We rally people around new initiatives. And as our churches grow, we become increasingly proficient in a myriad of other things from branding to facility management. But are we making disciples? Have we become proficient in many things while simultaneously becoming deficient in the one thing that matters most?

When the apostle Paul felt compelled to defend his ministry, he didn’t point to his savvy leadership, the size of his team, the creativity or innovation in his ministry, his speaking ability, or the number of mission trips he was leading. He simply pointed to the transformation in people’s lives.

I found these paragraphs so insightful and important that I copied them to a file for future use. There will be ministry meetings where these words will help orient our discussions and efforts.

I read an article about a year ago that distinguished between core tasks and peripheral tasks in your job. Core tasks are those that contribute to your success in your job. Peripheral tasks are the tasks which do not drive your success, but they are tasks that you have to do to support your job.

For me, as a campus minister, teaching and discipling are the tasks that drive the success in my ministry. Keeping track of my ministry’s budget is a task that, though is necessary, will not contribute to the success of my ministry. However, not keeping the budget could lead to my failure.

Peripheral tasks, therefore, are tasks whose completion won’t cause your work to succeed, but if not completed could cause your work to fail.

We have to monitor how much time we spend on core tasks to peripheral tasks. Spending time on peripheral tasks can give you the impression of success or cause others to think you are successful at what you do. But if you spend time on the peripheral tasks to the neglect of core tasks, you will keep yourself from being successful at your job.

Preachers, according to John Piper, are prophets, not professionals. One of the ways to understand this is that preachers are called to care more about their core tasks of praying, discipling, and ministering the word than they are to worry about management and leadership strategies, designing programs, and having an efficient office staff.

I’ve been reading Iain Murray’s biography of D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, one of the greatest evangelical preachers of the last 100 years. And what I’ve been impressed with is the way he kept his time focused on preaching, teaching, and discipling. He despised committees and found them mostly useless. I think he was right. His effectiveness is rooted in staying focused on the core tasks.

As ministers, we have to ask ourselves two questions. (If you are in another profession, it won’t be difficult to change the questions to suit your profession.)

First, what are the core tasks in my ministry work? Is designing the environment of your worship space core? Is your one-on-one meeting with someone in your church core if you just spend time together without praying or discussing spiritual issues? Is time spent reading and studying the “core”? These are difficult questions that you need to work out for yourself.

Second, how can I spend more time performing my core tasks and improving my performance of these tasks? For example, can you commit 20% of your time to discipling younger Christians in your ministry? Can you get off a useless committee and spend that hour becoming better prepared for you next lesson.

You have to be ruthlessly honest in asking these questinons. If you are dishonest with yourself, you might waste your time on tasks that won’t help you succeed. And you might open yourself up to failure.

For Ministers

Should Churches Sing Old Hymns?

Let me ask a question about worship songs: are there good reasons to sing older songs and hymns during worship?

I think that question gets asked a good bit. I’m unqualified to speak of trends in contemporary worship music. But it does seem that there has been a renewed interest in older hymns the last few years. So let me ask a stronger question: are there good reasons to sing older songs and hymns as frequently as we sing newer songs?

I think there are. Let me start by recapping some of C. S. Lewis’s comments about books, and then I’ll apply them to worship songs.

Lewis’s Arguments About Reading Old Books

In his Introduction to a new translation of Athanasius’s On the Incarnation, C. S. Lewis forcefully argued that you should read as many old books as you do new books.  He recommends that you read one old book for every new book you read. (Lewis was specifically talking about theological books. I think, though, that his reasons can be expanded to apply to all kinds of reading.)

Why does he recommend this? He gives three reasons:

First, he thought that the layperson should read old books because the layperson would get a greater sense of what Lewis chose to call “mere Christianity”. If you mix in older Christian books with your reading of newer books, you can come to an understanding of what the orthodox church has always held. Only reading modern books might lead you to a narrow or misguided view of what Christianity is. (Every era has its own bias and emphases.)

Second, the “classics” have stood the test of time; that is, they have been tested by different and diverse generations and have been considered well worth reading. Over the centuries, the hidden assumptions and implications of the books have been tested by Christians. The books were not found to lie outside of the boundaries of “mere Christianity.”

Third, old books “correct the characteristic mistakes of our own period. Our generation is prone to make certain theological mistakes and to emphasize certain theological truths at the expense of other truths. Older books help us correct these mistakes and overemphasis.

Three Arguments For Singing (Many) Old Hymns

I think these three arguments can be adapted to make an equally forceful case that we should sing many old hymns – even as many old songs and hymns as we sing newer songs.

Here are the three arguments:

1. We should sing old hymns because they give us a sense of “mere Christianity.” Perhaps it doesn’t seem this way, but hymns do teach us theology. We could learn from the Eastern Orthodox Church. They view their liturgy as one of the main sources of instruction for their worshippers. Our songs should be a source of Christian teaching for us. And when we frequently sing older hymns, we get a sense of the core Christian teachings that the church has always believed.

2. The older hymns have stood the test of time. A lot of songs and hymns were written that haven’t really stayed in use in Christian worship. The ones that did were the ones that stood the test of time, both musically and theologically.

3. The older hymns will help correct our generation’s unique tendencies to believe certain errors and overemphasize certain truths. This is similar, though distinct from, the second point. Since our hymns and songs teach us about our faith, then older hymns can teach us (or simply remind us of) teachings that we underemphasize or have simply gotten wrong.

One of my favorite examples of this is from the third verse of “Come Thou Fount of Every Blessing”:

O to grace how great a debtor
daily I’m constrained to be!
Let thy goodness, like a fetter,
bind my wandering heart to thee.
Prone to wander, Lord, I feel it,
prone to leave the God I love;
here’s my heart, O take and seal it,
seal it for thy courts above.

Whenever I sing this verse, it reminds me that, because of sin in my life, I am prone to leave God. What I need is God’s work on my heart to keep me secure is His grace.

The newer songs do not remind me of my sinfulness as much. This hymn reminds me of that basic Christian teaching.

Conclusion

There are good reasons to work older hymns and songs into our worship. Maybe these reasons can support the same ratio of old hymns to new hymns that C. S. Lewis recommended for books – one old hymn for every new song we sing. Whatever the mixture, I think it is wise for churches to make frequent use of the older hymns. They might not have the musical qualities that are preferred today – but who ever said the church made its decisions based only upon the musical qualities of those songs?

Page 1 of 912345...Last »